GTMGTM
Talk to sales

Operations · Advanced · 8 min read

Running outbound for ten clients without mixing them up

Workspace isolation, sender assignment, per-client review, and the economics that decide whether client eleven is profitable.

Agency outbound has one catastrophic failure mode and several expensive ones. The catastrophic one is cross-client leakage: one client's prospect receiving mail from another client's domain. It ends both relationships and there is no recovery.

The expensive ones are all margin: tooling that bills per seat or per sub-account, so the eleventh client costs more than the first earned.

Isolation has to be structural, not a filter

A shared list with a client column is one bad query away from a disaster. The boundary needs to be the container: each client's connections are their own, sourcing runs from that client's account, and there is no code path from one client's queue to another's sender.

Test it the way you would test a permission system: try to make it leak, deliberately, before a client does by accident.

Assign senders per client, and share deliberately

Some things are genuinely shared. An agency-owned warmup domain, a shared calendar. Those should be an explicit pool rather than an accident of configuration. Everything else belongs to one client.

  • One workspace per client, always.
  • Connections assigned to that workspace, not to the org.
  • A shared pool only for things you consciously decided to share.
  • White label so the client sees their brand, not yours or ours.

The one client who wants to read everything

There is always one. The mistake is making their caution everybody's workflow by turning on a global review queue.

Review belongs per campaign. That client's campaign holds its steps and is reviewed inside itself; every other client stays on autopilot.

The economics of client eleven

Work out your marginal cost per client before you sign the tenth. If the tool charges per connected account or per sub-workspace, that fee is your floor and it scales linearly while your price probably does not.

Data spend is the other half. Enrichment is priced per person revealed, so a client with a two-hundred-thousand-row TAM and a small retainer is a client you are subsidising.

Reporting the client will actually read

Sourced, contacted, replied, booked, on one period. Not a dashboard. The moment a client has to interpret a chart, they start asking whether the retainer is working.

The takeaway

Isolation is a container, review is per campaign, and margin is decided by the per-client line items rather than by the subscription.

OperationsAdvanced8 min

Read next

All guides
Operations · 9 minYour first outbound motion, in one afternoonA complete first motion. ICP, keywords, sending domain, sequence and the two numbers to watch. Set up in about four hours and honest about what week one will look like.Compliance · 9 minOutbound compliance without a legal teamWhat CAN-SPAM actually requires, where GDPR changes the answer, and the five mechanisms that make compliance a property of the system rather than a policy nobody reads.

Everything in these guides is a default in the product rather than an exercise left to the reader.

Everything above, running on your list

Describe the company, confirm the keywords, connect a channel. The agents take it from there, and Supervised mode is available when you want to review before sending.

Talk to salesSee pricing

Start with sales. $2,000 or $5,000 onboarding, then at least $250 monthly credit funding.